Psychology Today · June 7, 2026
Therapists Ignore AI at Their Own Peril

From the Sex Doctors
This article from Dr. Brandon certainly sparks a vital conversation, not just for therapists, but for anyone navigating their well-being in an increasingly tech-driven world. When we discuss artificial intelligence on The Sex Doctors Podcast, the immediate reaction from many listeners and even some of our colleagues is often a blend of skepticism and reassurance – "AI can't replace human connection," or "it's not sophisticated enough for real therapy." Yet, as Dr. Brandon points out, that perspective misses the critical trajectory of this technology and its tangible impact already being felt.
We hear from patients constantly about their struggles with access, cost, and the sheer challenge of finding a therapist who is a good fit. It’s no wonder that a readily available, inexpensive, and non-judgmental AI interface might seem appealing, particularly for those grappling with shame around sexual health or relationship issues. The idea that someone might actually prefer an AI because it feels less judgmental or doesn't come with the baggage of human interaction is a powerful insight we need to confront. This isn't just about efficiency; it's about a different kind of connection, or perhaps a lack thereof, that some find profoundly comforting.
From our clinical perspective, especially in the sensitive realms of sex therapy and urology, the nuance of human experience is paramount. Yet, we must acknowledge that not every interaction requires that deep, empathic human connection. Many initial questions, diagnostic inquiries, or even early-stage emotional processing could potentially be supported by AI. What happens to our training models, our fees, and even the very definition of "therapy" when the landscape shifts so dramatically? The concern isn't just about job security for clinicians, but about the future of specialized care. If the "worried well" increasingly turn to AI, where do emerging therapists gain the experience needed to treat more complex cases?
This isn't about fear-mongering; it's about foresight. We, as healthcare professionals, have a responsibility to understand these evolving tools, to critique them, and to integrate them wisely. Our goal isn’t to resist change, but to shape it, ensuring that technology serves the best interests of our patients and upholds the integrity of our professions. Ignoring AI won't make it disappear; it simply means we're allowing others to define its role without our clinical input.
Explore AI as a support tool, not just a threat, for initial screening or information. - Focus your human interactions on empathy, complex problem-solving, and unique relational healing. - Stay informed about AI advancements to understand its limitations and ethical implications for patient care.
From the original article
I took a continuing education class yesterday in which a colleague assured the audience that AI won't take our jobs. It wasn't the first time I've heard this in a CE setting. And each time it happens, I find myself more stunned than the last.
It is time for us, as a profession, to grapple with a rapidly changing future. If we cannot face disruption in our own professional lives, how will we help our clients face it in theirs? We only empower AI when we pretend we aren't competing with it.
This article originally appeared on Psychology Today.
View original on Psychology Today →